Zum Inhalt springen
← All articles
Politics at work6 Oct 20263 min read

The four sources of power for leaders

Title, budget, authority to give instructions: not wrong, but incomplete. Four sources of power leaders in complex organisations should know.

Four chess pieces of different heights on a dark table
Which sources of power do leaders have in complex organisations?
The classic answer is: title, budget, authority to give instructions. That is not wrong, but it is incomplete.
Anyone who wants to exert real influence in complex organisations should know and assess four sources of power. Not one of them, but all four.

1. Positional power

This is the most visible source of power: the title, the reporting line, budget responsibility, formal decision-making authority.
Positional power legitimises. It gives you the right to make decisions. But it does not prevail automatically as long as someone activates the informal structures against it.
Observable indicator in a corporation: Are your decisions implemented without follow-up questions, or does a sudden “need for alignment” arise as soon as you give an instruction? If the latter happens regularly, your positional power is probably weaker than your org chart suggests.

2. Expert power

Those who have knowledge others need have power. The controller who alone understands the budget logic. The lawyer without whose assessment no contract negotiation starts. The IT architect whose feasibility verdict ends projects before they begin.
Expert power gets you heard, but not automatically your way, because complex organisations usually have several experts with conflicting assessments. Those who prevail are often not those with the best expertise, but those who use it strategically.
Observable indicator in a corporation: Are you involved in decision processes before the direction is set, or only afterwards, as formal cover? The former points to real expert power. The latter shows that your expertise is recognised but not decisive.

3. Relational power

This is the source of power that does not appear in the org chart. Who has the trust of the decision-makers? Whose assessment is sought before the meeting begins? Who can forge or dissolve coalitions?
Relational power arises from reciprocity, reliability and strategic positioning. It builds up slowly and is lost quickly if not maintained.
Observable indicator in a corporation: Do you learn about strategic decisions before the official announcement or afterwards? Those informed in advance are often part of the network of trust. Those who only find out in the meeting, less so.

4. Information power

In modern organisations information is often distributed asymmetrically. Those who sit at the hubs of communication see the whole picture, while others know only fragments.
Information power does not mean knowing everything. It means knowing the right thing at the right time: unofficial moods, upcoming reorganisations, the decision-makers' actual priorities, the informal rules by which decisions are really made.
Those who can anticipate can shape. Those who can shape have power.
Observable indicator in a corporation: How often do colleagues proactively give you information without you asking? Those regularly used as a hub probably have information power. Those who always have to ask, less so.

Prioritising: which source of power matters in your situation?

Not every source of power is equally relevant in every situation. Three questions help:
  • Do you meet resistance even though your decisions are formally clear? Then check your positional power. Do you have the formal mandate, and is it actually respected?
  • Are your arguments heard but not implemented? Then your expert power is probably not enough. You need relational power: who has to stand behind you for this to change?
  • Are you surprised by developments others saw coming early? Then your information power is probably too weak. Who are the hubs in your organisation, and how close are you to them?
Classic models of power describe power as a state. Reality is more like this: power is a process. It arises from dependencies you have to assess, from information you have to work for and from coalitions you have to build.
Those who see through this do not lead harder, but smarter.
If you are in such a situation yourself and are looking for support, write me a few sentences about what it is about: Request a consultation. I read every enquiry myself and usually reply within 24 hours on working days.

Do you recognise your situation?

Briefly describe your situation. I read every enquiry myself and usually reply within 24 hours on working days.

Request a consultationPersonal · confidential
About the author
Markus Krahnke
Markus Krahnke

I make power relations readable. For leaders who want to act with integrity.

More about me →