Office politics covers the informal attempts through which people in organisations shape decisions outside the official channels. It arises where scarce resources, differing interests and uncertainty meet, in other words in almost every organisation.
The short definition
Every organisation has two levels. The official level consists of the org chart, processes and responsibilities. The real level consists of relationships, interests, history and timing. Office politics is what happens on that second level. Not every informal agreement is politics, though. What matters is that interests and influence are at play.
Research studies a related phenomenon under the term micropolitics, above all in German-language organisational research. The idea is the same: people pursue interests, form alliances and use room for manoeuvre that no job description provides.
Office politics is not the same as intrigue
Many leaders associate the term with manipulation, cliques and power games. Those exist. But they are only the destructive side. Anyone who discusses a project in advance with the right people, knows when a proposal stands a chance and takes other people's interests seriously is also doing politics, openly and with the matter in mind.
The difference is not whether you exert influence, but how: openly or covertly, for the sake of the matter or only for your own benefit, with long-term credibility or at the expense of others. Where exactly the line runs is not always clear. That is precisely why a clear inner stance helps.
Why good performance alone is often not enough
Many highly capable leaders experience the same moment at some point: a well-founded proposal fails even though many arguments support it. The reason often does not lie in the substance alone. Budget, risk and legal requirements always play a part. In addition, essential positions, alliances and objections have frequently been clarified beforehand in conversations you were not part of.
If you ignore the informal level, you leave it to others. If you read it, you have a better chance of having a say.
How to recognise office politics
- Essential positions are often settled before the meeting, not in it.
- Some people have more influence than their position suggests.
- Factual arguments fall flat because interests are at work in the background.
- Information often travels faster through relationships than through official channels.
- After a reorganisation, alliances shift before the org chart does.
How to handle it with integrity
The OFFICEPOLITICS® Method is our own practice-oriented consulting approach, not a scientifically established model. It works with three levels that build on each other:
- See through: Where are decisions really made, who influences them, which interests are at play?
- Position: Where do you stand, which alliances hold, where does counter-power arise?
- Navigate: Which conversations do you have, when, and with what framing?
The goal is not to out-trick others. The goal is to act with a realistic picture of the situation, without bending yourself out of shape.
Conclusion
Office politics is not a flaw in the system but part of it. It cannot be abolished, but it can be understood. Those who read the unwritten rules can lead effectively and stay true to their values.
Further reading
- Michel Crozier, Erhard Friedberg: L’acteur et le système (1977)
- Willi Küpper, Günther Ortmann (eds.): Mikropolitik. Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen (1988)
Do you recognise your situation?
Briefly describe your situation. I read every enquiry myself and usually reply within 24 hours on working days.
Request a consultationPersonal · confidential
